View Full Version : YOU THINK YOU WON THAT DECISION
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:35 PM
GUESS AGAIN, FAGGOT
http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/382541/20081124070930_E80E4658.JPG
HOODS
09-26-2010, 06:36 PM
affirmative action bud. It permeates all types of workplaces.
vincent_vega
09-26-2010, 06:37 PM
That nigga needs to get fired.
cecil is a bigger heel than josh koschek
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:40 PM
worst decisions I have ever seen.
Sherk/Dunham maaaaaaaaaby but Nog/Bader was utter BS
they both sucked
nog was clearly the better fighter
he stuffed alot of takedowns but god forbid if you let a few get through
Christina Hendtits
09-26-2010, 06:45 PM
they both sucked
nog was clearly the better fighter
he stuffed alot of takedowns but god forbid if you let a few get through
Stuffing take downs don't score points. Getting take downs does. Just sayin
no shit sherlock,but the fact is that thats all he could do,and he wasnt even that successful at it,while nog was tagging him up at will
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:48 PM
UFC - all you need is takedowns.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:49 PM
fuck the UFC, Strikeforce is the new shit.
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 06:51 PM
they both sucked
nog was clearly the better fighter
he stuffed alot of takedowns but god forbid if you let a few get through
lol
On the feet it was about even. Bader would get the better of one exchange, Nog would get the better of another.
hells naw bader migtve landed some shots but for the most part he was getting outstruck and was gassin out
desperation takedowns ftl
fuck the UFC, Strikeforce is the new shit.
because they lack the same amount of wrestlers? lol
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:54 PM
qft.
Nog was landing a lot of punches on him in the second and most def the third.
Shit decision.
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 06:55 PM
hells naw bader migtve landed some shots but for the most part he was getting outstruck and was gassin out
desperation takedowns ftl
No. Bader landed some shots, as did Nog.
I gave the third to Nog but it doesn't really matter. Bader won the first and second. He also came closest to winning the fight.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:55 PM
because they lack the same amount of wrestlers? lol
because their fights aren't clearly rigged when they go to a decision.
I was shocked they didn't give Serra the decision as well.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 06:58 PM
Didn't NSAC get rid of that fucking cunt Peoples at some point?
WAR SYNTHOL
09-26-2010, 07:10 PM
bader is a fucking can
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:11 PM
he was gassing after the first fight.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:11 PM
*round
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 07:15 PM
So what you're saying is Nog couldn't put away a gassed out Bader, even though he had 10 minutes to do it?
lol
what im saying is that nog won the fight and bader lost,thats all
clearly cecil peoples was giving handjobs to the other two judges
30 - 27? Really??
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:19 PM
So what you're saying is Nog couldn't put away a gassed out Bader, even though he had 10 minutes to do it?
lol
well he couldn't.
what do you want from me?
what im saying is that nog won the fight and bader lost,thats all
clearly cecil peoples was giving handjobs to the other two judges
30 - 27? Really??
lol, butthurt
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 07:20 PM
what im saying is that nog won the fight and bader lost,thats all
clearly cecil peoples was giving handjobs to the other two judges
30 - 27? Really??
Nice theory. Except ALL judges gave the fight to Bader, not just Peoples.
Nice theory. Except ALL judges gave the fight to Bader, not just Peoples.
HENCE THE HANDJOBS TO STEER THEIR OPINIONS
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:24 PM
the judges are fucking useless, I want no time limits and no judges, the fight goes to submission, ko or death.
gis must be re-introduced
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:25 PM
Royce would take the belt in all divisions.
flashNsmash
09-26-2010, 07:28 PM
nog and bader both fought like cans, fuck 'em
flashNsmash
09-26-2010, 07:28 PM
jon 'bones' jones destroys either one of them regardless
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 07:29 PM
the judges are fucking useless, I want no time limits and no judges, the fight goes to submission, ko or death.
Obviously you weren't around in the early days.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:33 PM
Obviously you weren't around in the early days.
It would be fucking awesome, dude.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:34 PM
head butts, biting, GIs, no time limits, no judges...
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 07:35 PM
I'm watching Shamrock vs Severn to remind me of how awesome it was.
flashNsmash
09-26-2010, 07:35 PM
no weight classes
brock vs jake shields, make it happen
SatNav
09-26-2010, 07:37 PM
I'm watching Shamrock vs Severn to remind me of how awesome it was.
those guys are cans.
Can you imagine Brock pretty much molesting Mir to death?
HOODS
09-26-2010, 08:08 PM
No. Bader landed some shots, as did Nog.
I gave the third to Nog but it doesn't really matter. Bader won the first and second. He also came closest to winning the fight.
by that logic dunham beat sherk.
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:08 PM
worst decisions I have ever seen.
Sherk/Dunham maaaaaaaaaby but Nog/Bader was utter BS
:neutral:
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:09 PM
Stuffing take downs don't score points. Getting take downs does. Just sayin
successful takedowns>failed submission attempts
success and fail being the key words
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:09 PM
fuck the UFC, Strikeforce is the new shit.
and you'd bitch about fights like shields vs. hendo...
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:10 PM
lol
On the feet it was about even. Bader would get the better of one exchange, Nog would get the better of another.
didn't bader drop nog in the 1st round?
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 08:10 PM
by that logic dunham beat sherk.
I think there's a case for Dunham getting robbed. Not so for Nogueira.
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:11 PM
bader is a fucking can
i like bader but he's gonna get murdered by bones jones
saf just came in this thread like hiiiiiiiiiiiiiyah NO PRIDE WIN DECISION OHO MAN THE CONSTABLES
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:12 PM
Nice theory. Except ALL judges gave the fight to Bader, not just Peoples.
plus every major mma site scored it for bader. you guys wanna bitch about a decision, what the fuck was that 30-27 score for guillard all about, seriously
HOODS
09-26-2010, 08:13 PM
I think there's a case for Dunham getting robbed. Not so for Nogueira.
as for the nog fight i dont give a fuck i watched it with no commentary at a bar so i just saw the fight with no bias and all i saw was bader missing 9 out of 10 punches he threw, he would whiff bad by like 2 feet he would miss. And then he would go for a takedown and take the round simply by scoring a takedown. He clearly won the fight by the way the commission scores fights. It looked like a real shitfest and neither of them should be happy with the fight.
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:14 PM
I think there's a case for Dunham getting robbed. Not so for Nogueira.
you could make a case for either sherk or bader winning 2 outta 3 rounds, but i don't know how you could give melvin guillard a fight 30-27 when his opponent landed the only 2 significant strikes of the fight
shadyasfok
09-26-2010, 08:15 PM
since nog got a gift in the brilz fight, either way he's even
since nog got a gift in the brilz fight, either way he's even
nog won that too but that fight was way closer
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 08:16 PM
successful takedowns>failed submission attempts
success and fail being the key words
If you're gonna award people for defending a take down, you need to do the same when someone successfully avoids strikes.
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 08:17 PM
nog won that too but that fight was way closer
lol
That was much more of a robbery.
If you're gonna award people for defending a take down, you need to do the same when someone successfully avoids strikes.
you shouldnt award for defense but jesus christ,scoring a takedown in mma has way too much value
these guys do nothing with the fucking takedown,get succesfully tied up,and the fight gets stood up again and the guy is now ahead somehow
hell if you got your ass beat for a whole rd and then rally in the last30 seconds and score a takedown the round might be a fucking tie holy shit
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 08:21 PM
as for the nog fight i dont give a fuck i watched it with no commentary at a bar so i just saw the fight with no bias and all i saw was bader missing 9 out of 10 punches he threw, he would whiff bad by like 2 feet he would miss. And then he would go for a takedown and take the round simply by scoring a takedown. He clearly won the fight by the way the commission scores fights. It looked like a real shitfest and neither of them should be happy with the fight.
Maybe you couldn't see properly, being in a bar and all, but he landed plenty of clean shots on Nogueira.
The stand up exchanges were fairly close, although Nog definitely took the third imo.
And another thing, he clearly won under Pride rules and any other rule set I can think of.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 08:22 PM
I completely agree with HH
INS_tha_rebel
09-26-2010, 08:23 PM
you shouldnt award for defense but jesus christ,scoring a takedown in mma has way too much value
these guys do nothing with the fucking takedown,get succesfully tied up,and the fight gets stood up again and the guy is now ahead somehow
I think you need to pick a different fight to test this theory, the stand up was fairly even as I saw it.
SatNav
09-26-2010, 08:25 PM
I think you need to pick a different fight to test this theory, the stand up was fairly even as I saw it.
I don't understand where you get that from, to me it looked like Nog was pretty much landing on him at will even rocking him once or twice and Bader having a hard time even touching him.
I think you need to pick a different fight to test this theory, the stand up was fairly even as I saw it.
from what i remember watching it,nog was consitently landing more,Bader went for alot of takedowns and alot of them got stuffed
bader did get a few but i really dont see him as bettering nogueira in this fight
maybe with the criteria bader won,but theres something really wrong here
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.